Peace in Palestine: Another resolution?

By A Jerusalem Voice for Justice

Peace in Palestine Paix en Palestine

A purported plan for peace in Palestine proposed by President Donald Trump was endorsed by a United Nations Security Council vote earlier this week. It seeks to advance a process that began last month with a ceasefire in Gaza that Israel has repeatedly violated to deadly effect. While the plan has been hailed in some quarters as opening a potential path to peace, questions remain about how just or durable that peace could be.

This statement on the plan was released by A Jerusalem Voice for Justice, who asked Development and Peace ― Caritas Canada to help disseminate it. They are a collective that serves as “an ecumenical witness for equality and a just peace in Palestine/Israel.” We have shared other missives from them in April and June. The collective includes His Beatitude Michel Sabbah, Emeritus Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, and the eminent Jesuit scholar, Fr. David Neuhaus. Last year, Fr. David had traced the history of the Israel-Palestine conflict and answered our members’ questions about it.

Jerusalem, 19.11.2025

UNSC 2803 (17.11.2025), based upon a draft of the United States administration, was accepted by thirteen of the Security Council member states while two (Russia and China) abstained. The resolution seeks to establish a “Board of Peace”, headed by President Trump, that would oversee an International Stabilization Force.

There are some positive aspects to the US brokered ceasefire of October 4, 2025, and this resolution: less genocide, less domicide, less displacement, and less dismantling of the few Palestinian institutions that still remain. However, despite the ceasefire, the destruction of Gaza and its population is ongoing. (About 250 Gazans have been killed and about 650 injured since the ceasefire went into effect.) Will the UN resolution lead to Palestinian self-determination? It conditions self-determination on Palestinian “reforms”. Are the intended reforms meant to end corruption and bad administration or do they seek to impose the acceptance of Israeli/US constraints on self-determination. A people’s right to self-determination cannot be conditioned, especially not by those who have prevented this self-determination for decades. Moreover, self-determination begins with a free democratic process, without Israeli or US interference.

There are negative aspects to this resolution too. It smacks of traditional colonialism: the administration of Gaza by foreigners, led by the US President. Undoubtedly, the most negative aspect of the resolution is its lack of a global vision. It ignores the realities in the West Bank (including East Jerusalem): the violent dismantling of Palestinian refugee camps and villages, the extreme violence of the Israeli army and police, and especially Jewish settler vigilantes, the ongoing obstacles to the daily life of Palestinians there and attempts to obliterate their identity. Overall, the resolution adopts a problematic perspective: the problem began on October 7, 2023. However, this ignores the true genesis of the conflict.

There is no way forward unless we are willing to rethink the global situation in Palestine/Israel. Since the British Balfour Declaration (1917), discourse has been based upon a division into Jew and non-Jew, establishing the inequality that has emerged since then. The 1947 UN partition plan was in direct continuity with British colonial rule: the enforced establishment of a Jewish ethnocentric state. Jews are connected to this land and are not simply colonial settlers. However, their link with the land is not exclusive, and it does not give them a right to dispossess and displace, repress and occupy, destroy and commit genocide. Dismantling the system of ethnocentricity, discrimination and occupation must seek to integrate Jewish Israelis into a new reality that opens up on the horizon – a multi-cultural and pluralist society that ensures equality, justice and peace for all who live in Palestine/Israel today.

Signatories:

  • Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Michel Sabbah (emeritus)
  • Greek Orthodox Archbishop Attallah Hanna
  • Lutheran Bishop of the Holy Land Munib Younan (emeritus)
  • Mr. Yusef Daher
  • Ms. Sawsan Bitar
  • Mr. Samuel Munayer
  • Ms. Dina Nasser
  • Mr. John Munayer
  • Ms. Sandra Khoury
  • Rev. David Neuhaus, SJ
  • Rev. Frans Bouwen, MAfr
  • Rev. Firas Abdrabbo
  • Mr. Rafi Ghattas
  • Rev. Alessandro Barchi
  • and other members

SEARCH for :

STAY INFORMED

Don’t miss anything about the work of our international partners or our awareness and mobilization campaigns.

Sign up now for our newsletter.